"Halo: Reach" Reviews Go Up

Zillah wrote:Ugh! This game is really making me want a 360 but then, no.
Online is 60 bucks + No games I really want except for Reach.
What to do...

Well for live I just wait to renew when they have deals like right now you can renew for 40 bucks for a year or something.

Zillah wrote:Ugh! This game is really making me want a 360 but then, no.
Online is 60 bucks + No games I really want except for Reach.
What to do...

If you didn't buy a 360 for Halo 3 than this game is not going to all of sudden make you fall in love. There is no doubt this game is chock full of content but keep in mind it's designed for the Halo fanbase.

This game wasn't designed to being in new people. Bungie has a 10+ million fanbase and this is their last Halo game. They don't need to risk losing their fans by leaving a bad taste in their mouth. Especially since they are now going solo.

BlackStigma wrote:

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:I cannot wait for this game. Its getting some great reviews. 4 out of 22 people gave it AA scores. I say this is a pretty damn good game.

Of course it is. It's Halo. It's Bunjie. The reviews can go either way, really. There are 22 reviewers. It's bound to start getting some 70's and 80's which will drastically alter the rating.

Of 86 reviews, Halo 3 only got 2 below 80 scores. 13 80's. 71 AAA scores. Reach's score will more likely go up than down. It's already gone up to a 94.

what are you looking at stigma? it still says 93.

yonny616 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:I cannot wait for this game. Its getting some great reviews. 4 out of 22 people gave it AA scores. I say this is a pretty damn good game.

Of course it is. It's Halo. It's Bunjie. The reviews can go either way, really. There are 22 reviewers. It's bound to start getting some 70's and 80's which will drastically alter the rating.

Of 86 reviews, Halo 3 only got 2 below 80 scores. 13 80's. 71 AAA scores. Reach's score will more likely go up than down. It's already gone up to a 94.

what are you looking at stigma? it still says 93.

But it was 94 for a few hours.

yonny616 wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:I cannot wait for this game. Its getting some great reviews. 4 out of 22 people gave it AA scores. I say this is a pretty damn good game.

Of course it is. It's Halo. It's Bunjie. The reviews can go either way, really. There are 22 reviewers. It's bound to start getting some 70's and 80's which will drastically alter the rating.

Of 86 reviews, Halo 3 only got 2 below 80 scores. 13 80's. 71 AAA scores. Reach's score will more likely go up than down. It's already gone up to a 94.

what are you looking at stigma? it still says 93.

When he said that, it was 94

It's a 92 now.

Alot of fanboys are bitching about how 92 isn't enough

Honestly though, does Metacritic matter? Ive seen games on there below 70 and I still absolutly loved them.

TheJubJub5721 wrote:Honestly though, does Metacritic matter? Ive seen games on there below 70 and I still absolutly loved them.

Oh no, it doesn't matter. But why don't you read the title of this thread for me?

I'll wait.

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:Honestly though, does Metacritic matter? Ive seen games on there below 70 and I still absolutly loved them.

Oh no, it doesn't matter. But why don't you read the title of this thread for me?

I'll wait.

Halo Reach reviews....soo?

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:Honestly though, does Metacritic matter? Ive seen games on there below 70 and I still absolutly loved them.

Oh no, it doesn't matter. But why don't you read the title of this thread for me?

I'll wait.

Halo Reach reviews....soo?

So it matters in this thread?

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

SlySonji™ wrote:

TheJubJub5721 wrote:Honestly though, does Metacritic matter? Ive seen games on there below 70 and I still absolutly loved them.

Oh no, it doesn't matter. But why don't you read the title of this thread for me?

I'll wait.

Halo Reach reviews....soo?

So it matters in this thread?

Yeah, but outside the thread reviews dont matter, thats what I was trying to say.

As always fanboy destroy the user score -.- .
Someone says the Ai is bad and gives it 0 out of 10
Oh and if a guy named Killzone 3 gives it a 0 out of 10 , you should really have faith in his score ... If you know what i mean.
THe User score of Halo reach gets destroyed by the same kinds of fools, who gave games like Uncharted low user scores.. fucking fanboys.

Everyone who likes it gives it a 10 ,everyone who doesnt gives it a 0, because all they know is black and white.

Gutzahn wrote:As always fanboy destroy the user score -.- .
Someone says the Ai is bad and gives it 0 out of 10
Oh and if a guy named Killzone 3 gives it a 0 out of 10 , you should really have faith in his score ... If you know what i mean.
THe User score of Halo reach gets destroyed by the same kinds of fools, who gave games like Uncharted low user scores.. fucking fanboys.

Everyone who likes it gives it a 10 ,everyone who doesnt gives it a 0, because all they know is black and white.

Shoulda seen Alan Wake, the User Score was at a 1.9 at one point, then the user score was reset.

Who didn't expect this?

Zillah wrote:Ugh! This game is really making me want a 360 but then, no.
Online is 60 bucks + No games I really want except for Reach.
What to do...

I got 12 months of XBL Gold today for $30, along with a Halo Reach avatar item.

But being a fraghead, I think you'd be really into Gears of War.

BlackStigma wrote:

Zillah wrote:Ugh! This game is really making me want a 360 but then, no.
Online is 60 bucks + No games I really want except for Reach.
What to do...

I got 12 months of XBL Gold today for $30, along with a Halo Reach avatar item.

But being a fraghead, I think you'd be really into Gears of War.

I've played Gears 1&2 before.
I've played a lot of the 360 games before.
I just don't know about spending 330$ on a gaming console that I wont play that much.

Zillah wrote:

BlackStigma wrote:

Zillah wrote:Ugh! This game is really making me want a 360 but then, no.
Online is 60 bucks + No games I really want except for Reach.
What to do...

I got 12 months of XBL Gold today for $30, along with a Halo Reach avatar item.

But being a fraghead, I think you'd be really into Gears of War.

I've played Gears 1&2 before.
I've played a lot of the 360 games before.
I just don't know about spending 330$ on a gaming console that I wont play that much.

Just stick with your PS3 then, or ask your mommy to buy one for you.

BlackStigma wrote: Just stick with your PS3 then, or ask your mommy to buy one for you.

I might. I don't think my mommy would want me to spend that much time in the house playing video games anyways.

BACK ON TOPIC
halo reach rules

tahmidk wrote:BACK ON TOPIC
halo reach rules

Yes it does! the matchmaking is really addictive!

TheJubJub5721 wrote:

tahmidk wrote:BACK ON TOPIC
halo reach rules

Yes it does! the matchmaking is really addictive!

How can matchmaking be addictive? Matches can be addictive, but matchmaking? Maybe i understand something wrong here, but if you say matchmaking, you think of the stuff, that puts you together with other people to start a game???

If im correct and anyone understands the shit i just said then :

dedicated Server > any kind of matchmaking

Thats why Cod 4 at the pc > Cod 4 at the console

Reaper wrote:God i hate Destructoid, their reviews shouldnt be allowed in Metacritic, such troll reviews.

Anyway good for Reach i actually like the look of it, its about time Halo had some space battles. After all, thats the main reason the humans were losing the war because although they won quite often on the ground, they were gettin thumped in space.

The user reviews seem to be ok aswell, even with the troll reviews. Gotta love troll reviews they have the worst reasons for hating a game. Killzone 2 got alot of troll reviews and i quote

"i hate the shitty graphics, i mean c'mon people lets b serious, it looks like friggin pack man and the gameplay is like putting an elephant dick in your throut, impossible, no i do not have a ps3, and this doesn't help me, i,m glad with my 360, ps3 sucks major balzzzzzz"

Author : "guywhohateskillzone"

dude what the fuck is wrong with destructoid? they were the only ones man enough to give ffxiii a 4 which someone who's not a ff fanboy could have done yet everyone on every other web pretty much just gave it high scores which were pretty bullshit

tahmidk wrote:

Reaper wrote:God i hate Destructoid, their reviews shouldnt be allowed in Metacritic, such troll reviews.

Anyway good for Reach i actually like the look of it, its about time Halo had some space battles. After all, thats the main reason the humans were losing the war because although they won quite often on the ground, they were gettin thumped in space.

The user reviews seem to be ok aswell, even with the troll reviews. Gotta love troll reviews they have the worst reasons for hating a game. Killzone 2 got alot of troll reviews and i quote

"i hate the shitty graphics, i mean c'mon people lets b serious, it looks like friggin pack man and the gameplay is like putting an elephant dick in your throut, impossible, no i do not have a ps3, and this doesn't help me, i,m glad with my 360, ps3 sucks major balzzzzzz"

Author : "guywhohateskillzone"

dude what the fuck is wrong with destructoid? they were the only ones man enough to give ffxiii a 4 which someone who's not a ff fanboy could have done yet everyone on every other web pretty much just gave it high scores which were pretty bullshit

They gave it a 4 cause they didn't like that type of game.
You see that? IT WASN'T THERE STYLE.
Whoever reviewed it, it wasn't their type of JRPG. Some people love FF13, but Destructiod is pretty much ass.