PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
+10
txtman8094
Quatro40
TheJubJub5721
chobo500
Epzaos
Stoney
CyberpunkCentral
Zillah
MEGAlan
TRF
14 posters
:: General Gaming :: Microsoft
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
What's your favorite 360 game of 2010?
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
I actually didn't think 3 was that good. They stepped up the MP definitely, but everything else was meh.
TheJubJub5721- PS3 Nation Greats
- Posts : 1252
Join date : 2010-08-24
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
Reach is definitely the best Halo game. While I didn't love the campaign, I thought it had the best multiplayer, and multiplayer is much more important to me in a Halo game. Reach's multiplayer is massive and offers so much bang for the buck, and I love almost every addition Bungie added.
But overall, like I said, Fable III is my favorite 360 game this year.
But overall, like I said, Fable III is my favorite 360 game this year.
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Halo Reach is miles better than Halo 3. In every aspect too.
MEGAlan- Forum Regular
- Posts : 495
Join date : 2010-10-02
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
It depends on what you're into. If you like simpler multiplayer, then Halo 3 is a great choice. It's got a very simple, arcadey feel to it. Same goes for Halo 2. Halo: Reach is a little more complex because of the currency and whatnot.MEGAlan wrote:Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Halo Reach is miles better than Halo 3. In every aspect too.
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
TRF wrote:It depends on what you're into. If you like simpler multiplayer, then Halo 3 is a great choice. It's got a very simple, arcadey feel to it. Same goes for Halo 2. Halo: Reach is a little more complex because of the currency and whatnot.MEGAlan wrote:Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Halo Reach is miles better than Halo 3. In every aspect too.
How is the currency complex? It's much more straight forward than the True Skill system they had in Halo 3. It took me while to figure out how rankings for ranked matches worked. Plus that were were like 3 different types of XP you could earn and it was very complicated and was a bit hard to keep up with.
Like I said Reach is better in every aspect and Bungie made sure of that.
MEGAlan- Forum Regular
- Posts : 495
Join date : 2010-10-02
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
It's not too complex, but it added another layer of complexity to the game. In Halo 3, you didn't have to worry about daily and weekly challenges and you didn't have to worry about buying anything.MEGAlan wrote:TRF wrote:It depends on what you're into. If you like simpler multiplayer, then Halo 3 is a great choice. It's got a very simple, arcadey feel to it. Same goes for Halo 2. Halo: Reach is a little more complex because of the currency and whatnot.MEGAlan wrote:Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Halo Reach is miles better than Halo 3. In every aspect too.
How is the currency complex? It's much more straight forward than the True Skill system they had in Halo 3. It took me while to figure out how rankings for ranked matches worked. Plus that were were like 3 different types of XP you could earn and it was very complicated and was a bit hard to keep up with.
Like I said Reach is better in every aspect and Bungie made sure of that.
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
I have to go with "Other" or Virtual On Force. Played it at my cousin's house. Loved it.
NoelX2- Forum Regular
- Posts : 390
Join date : 2010-03-29
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
TRF wrote:It's not too complex, but it added another layer of complexity to the game. In Halo 3, you didn't have to worry about daily and weekly challenges and you didn't have to worry about buying anything.MEGAlan wrote:TRF wrote:It depends on what you're into. If you like simpler multiplayer, then Halo 3 is a great choice. It's got a very simple, arcadey feel to it. Same goes for Halo 2. Halo: Reach is a little more complex because of the currency and whatnot.MEGAlan wrote:Zillah.™ wrote:ghost23 wrote:Reach. Being a Halo fan since the original way back in 2001, Reach is definitely the best Halo game. The overall package is just so polished and refined and it really represents everything that Bungie has learned building Halo for a decade
Meh. I loved 3.
Halo Reach is miles better than Halo 3. In every aspect too.
How is the currency complex? It's much more straight forward than the True Skill system they had in Halo 3. It took me while to figure out how rankings for ranked matches worked. Plus that were were like 3 different types of XP you could earn and it was very complicated and was a bit hard to keep up with.
Like I said Reach is better in every aspect and Bungie made sure of that.
There is nothing complex about daily/weekly challenges. And it's not even a new concept. COD has had challenges for years now and I don't see people complaining about that.
And you DON'T have to worry about buying anything in Reach. The armor in Reach is merely cosmetic.
Want to talk complicated? Getting Recon armor on Halo 3 ....Do I need to explain any further?
MEGAlan- Forum Regular
- Posts : 495
Join date : 2010-10-02
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
Mass Effect 2 even though I didn't finish it
gow- Fanboy
- Posts : 213
Join date : 2010-05-22
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
I didn't say it was THAT complex. I'm just saying it provides a little bit extra to do. Halo 3 just seemed a lot simpler to me. And what's so difficult about Recon armor? Your mouth, Bungie's dick, that's it. Two factors. Well, I'm sure girth is also a factor, but overall it's pretty simple. And if you decided to take the low route and play ODST, then you deserve Recon way more than the guy who likes good games and just decided to suck a Bungie cock instead.MEGAlan wrote:There is nothing complex about daily/weekly challenges. And it's not even a new concept. COD has had challenges for years now and I don't see people complaining about that.
And you DON'T have to worry about buying anything in Reach. The armor in Reach is merely cosmetic.
Want to talk complicated? Getting Recon armor on Halo 3 ....Do I need to explain any further?
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
gow wrote:Mass Effect 2 even though I didn't finish it
go finish it. It's amazing
ghost23- Newb Gamer
- Posts : 18
Join date : 2010-11-14
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
TRF wrote:I didn't say it was THAT complex. I'm just saying it provides a little bit extra to do. Halo 3 just seemed a lot simpler to me. And what's so difficult about Recon armor? Your mouth, Bungie's dick, that's it. Two factors. Well, I'm sure girth is also a factor, but overall it's pretty simple. And if you decided to take the low route and play ODST, then you deserve Recon way more than the guy who likes good games and just decided to suck a Bungie cock instead.MEGAlan wrote:There is nothing complex about daily/weekly challenges. And it's not even a new concept. COD has had challenges for years now and I don't see people complaining about that.
And you DON'T have to worry about buying anything in Reach. The armor in Reach is merely cosmetic.
Want to talk complicated? Getting Recon armor on Halo 3 ....Do I need to explain any further?
Sucking cock might be simple to you since you are experienced at it but I wouldn't go that far.
I still don't understand this massive hate you have for ODST. It was fun. It was a nice change from the run and gun Halo games that we all know and love. My only problem was that for someone like me who already had Halo 3 and most of the DLC I didn't see the justification of it being a full 60 bucks. The game would have definitely had great competitive multiplayer if it was implemented.
MEGAlan- Forum Regular
- Posts : 495
Join date : 2010-10-02
Re: PS3N's Xbox 360 Game of the Year!
dang, its a tie between Fable 3 and Halo Reach. i love both of those games. I'll have to go with Halo Reach. i haven't had that much fun playing a shooter in a LONG time
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» PS3 To Outsell Xbox 360 By The End of This Year!?
» 2011: A make or Break year for Xbox 360
» Game Of The Year
» PS3N's PC Game of the Year!
» PS3N's Wii Game of the Year!
» 2011: A make or Break year for Xbox 360
» Game Of The Year
» PS3N's PC Game of the Year!
» PS3N's Wii Game of the Year!
:: General Gaming :: Microsoft
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|