Re: Halo Reach Changes Vs. COD Changes [this gen]

by **Zillah** Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:27 pm

- on gameplay vids, it looks like Halo 3: ODST 2 .

by **TRF** Sat May 01, 2010 2:25 am

K-Zillah wrote:- on gameplay vids, it looks like Halo 3: ODST 2 .

I honestly don't understand how you figure that.

Sure, the core gameplay is there, but enough has been added to warrant a sequel.

by **Zillah** Sat May 01, 2010 2:30 am

- You no what TRF, you're right .
Chicken is good with Beer . XD

But yeah, it's like other games, the core gameplay is there, but new stuff is added .
nothing to flashy though .

by **TRF** Sat May 01, 2010 2:34 am

K-Zillah wrote:- You no what TRF, you're right .
Chicken is good with Beer . XD

But yeah, it's like other games, the core gameplay is there, but new stuff is added .
nothing to flashy though .

Well, the value of these additions is decided by the individual consumer. I was just trying to show you that the game has undergone a lot of changes. At its core, it's still Halo, but Bungie added a ton of new gameplay elements. Whether those changes mean anything is up to you, but I myself am psyched for this game.

by FaytSaratome Sat May 01, 2010 7:11 pm

I'm agreeing with TRF on this one, Reach has changed so much it can hardly be called repackaged. From what I read and seen, this is a legit sequel..err...prequel.

by Angelus the Wraith Mon May 03, 2010 12:58 am

Zillah, "Don't judge a pizza before you eat it"

People call me a fanboy for more subtle (and less hypocritical) reasons than what you are doing.

by Sponsored content